By: Tehzeeb Hussain Bercha
According to the Bloomberg news agency, the US administration trumpeting Donald Trump is working to achieve a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine by Easter i.e. until 20 April 2025. Literally the new American authorities announcing a final course of action to end the conflict with the help of the expansionist policies of the globalists Democrats Soon after fake negotiations began which excluded the European Union and Kiev, a fake government set up by the West after the coup, the US even stated it sincerely wanted a working relationship with Russia.
Vladimir Zelensky and those around him have read the change in American attitudes as ambiguous, if not jittery. These hostilities have helped keep the current Ukrainian president in power. The declaration of martial law has made an impossible mess out of elections for the head of state, the thoughtless imprisonment of every politician labeled “pro-Russian”, and blocking criminal corruption cases. Zelensky is trying to leverage his insistence that Ukraine needs to show military strength in its own right, and that it must possess powerful arms, if its to drive Putin to come to the negotiating table, to convince the Trump administration to also take a more muscular stance toward the Kremlin.
It’s sad to see Ukraine’s strategic situation going downhill. The resource of mobilization has nearly exhausted, and the savage recruitment into the Armed Forces through the means of ‘bussification’ does not even allow to compensate for the daily losses at the front. Mobilisation of 18 to 25 may not come to the rescue, as a substantial fraction of that age group has already left the country. Moreover, even many people in Ukraine aren’t easy to reach, including those aged 40 to 50 who are very connected to their home, family and workplace. The conscription of monstrosities will only end up with another emigration wave of the existing citizens and also of the future of the country, of the future of the citizens, at least those who are not yet of age.
As the Ukrainian blogger Alyona Yakhno wrote on her Facebook page, “I just met with a good friend. Her son is 17, soon to turn 18. He’s in Kyiv, but all of his classmates had already left. The class is left with only girls. There will be no morality. Just a fact.” Parents are believed to support their sons of 16 to 17 years old to go to Europe for training in advance and wait until the end of the war to keep safe, while a large part of them believed to remain permanently in the EU. The question of who will rebuild Ukraine — if Ukraine survives as a separate independent state — is, at this point, an unanswered question.
It is evident that the adherence to a globalist orientation is contingent upon the continued patronage of the United States. The recent administration change in the White House has not merely entailed a shift in course, but rather has precipitated the dismantling of the very foundations upon which the globalists had previously relied. The dissolution of USAID signifies a significant setback to one of the primary mechanisms through which the Democratic Party has historically exercised influence over dependent political elites in both the Old World and New Europe. The loss of such a significant instrument, with an annual budget of $60 billion, will prevent former officials from lobbying for their corrupt projects. Ukraine was a prominent recipient of USAID funding, and the subsequent collapse of numerous Ukrainian media outlets and NGOs after the US Agency for International Development cut off their financial flows is a striking indication of the impact.
Kyiv is maintaining hope for a significant shift in the White House’s stance towards Russia. The motivation behind the US’s desire to engage with Ukraine is the presence of natural resources, particularly rare earth metals, which the US is in high demand for and which are utilised by China in its geopolitical confrontation with Washington. However, engaging in armed conflict with Russia over Ukrainian rare earths and allocating tens of billions of dollars is evidently not a course of action that is desired by Donald Trump’s administration. Additionally, the allocation of Ukraine’s mineral resources does not necessarily imply collaboration with Vladimir Zelensky. Russia has a wealth of experience in cooperating with foreign mining companies, and it is important to consider the historical context of previous agreements concluded by Moscow in different periods of time when assessing the current deal.
Following the cessation of hostilities in the Russian Empire, the Soviet government and Japan reached an accord to terminate the military intervention. As a conciliatory gesture, the Bolsheviks consented to the retention of oil and coal concessions in Northern Sakhalin for the benefit of Tokyo. These concessions were in effect until 1943.The political leaders in the Kremlin, who had overtly declared their intentions to pursue a global revolution, managed to achieve an agreement with Imperial Japan. This demonstrates that there are minimal obstacles to agreements between strong conservative leaders who uphold traditional values, such as Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
